Zoning Board of
Appeals Minutes
MINUTES
Cascade Charter Township Zoning Board of Appeals
Tuesday, January 14, 2003
7:00 pm
ARTICLE 1. Vice Chair Lewis called the meeting to order.
Members Present: Beahan, Casey, Lewis, Robinson, Wilson
Members Absent: Estes (excused) and Timmons (unexcused).
Others present: Planning Director Peterson, Admin. Assistant
Thompson and those listed on Supplement #1.
The Vice Chair from 2002 – Jack Lewis – called the meeting to order
and acted as Chairman for the Election of Officers.
ARTICLE 2. Election of Officers &
Appointment to Representative to Village Design Review Committee
Vice Chair Lewis welcomed new 1st Alternate Member Mel
Casey to the Board.
Vice Chair Lewis then called for nominations from the floor.
Member Robinson nominated Member Beahan for Chairman. Member Lewis
supported the nomination. The nominations were closed. The motion
carried.
Member Lewis nominated Member Robinson for Vice Chair/Secretary.
Member Beahan supported the nomination. The nominations were closed.
The motion carried.
Member Lewis nominated Member Wilson as the ZBA Representative to
the Village Design Review Committee. Member Beahan supported the
nomination. The nominations were closed. The motion carried.
Chairman Beahan acted as Chairman for the remainder of the meeting.
ARTICLE 3. Member Lewis supported by Member Robinson moved to
approve the agenda. The motion carried and the agenda was approved.
ARTICLE 4. The Minutes of the November 12, 2002 meeting were
approved on motion by Member Lewis and supported by Member Robinson.
The motion carried.
ARTICLE 4a. The Planning Commission Minutes of:
September 16, 2002
October 7, 2002
October 21, 2002
November 4, 2002
November 18, 2002
December 16, 2002
were received and filed.
ARTICLE 5. Case #02-2527: Performance Systematix
(PUBLIC HEARING)
The applicant requested a variance to allow the construction of a
new driveway ten feet closer to the existing driveway at 5505 – 33rd
Street.
(Member Wilson entered the meeting at 7:05 pm).
Planning Director Peterson related the property is located on the
northwest corner of Kraft Avenue and 33rd Street.
Originally this was a ten acre parcel and has been split to build this
building on the south five acres. The applicant received site plan
approval from the Planning Commission at their January 6, 2003
meeting. One condition of that approval was to receive a variance for
the driveway location. Access to the site was definitely an issue
during site plan approval. It is difficult to meet the Township
ordinance in regard to spacing alignment as well as the County
standards. There is a small area which would meet the Township
requirement on Kraft Avenue but the County would not issue a driveway
permit at that location. Planning Director Peterson pointed out the
proposed driveway location near the west property line. Planning
Director Peterson referred to Appendix B of the Zoning Ordinance and
related because 33rd Street is considered to be a local
street, the driveways are required to be spaced at 100 foot intervals.
The actual posted speed limit on 33rd Street is 35 miles per hour
which would require a driveway spacing of 160 feet. But this section
of the Zoning Ordinance has not been updated since its adoption in
1993. Planning Director Peterson related the applicant is seeking
relief from the Zoning Ordinance for ten feet to have the driveway
located 90 feet away from the driveway at 5503 – 33rd
Street. There will be no access to Kraft Avenue unless a joint
driveway with the property owner to the north can be worked out.
Planning Director Peterson recommended approval of the applicant’s
request. He also related it may be time for the Planning Commission to
look at updating that section of the Ordinance.
Member Robinson asked what are the pros and cons of a Kraft Avenue
driveway? Planning Director Peterson responded access for the property
owner but an additional drive to an internal road can cause problems
especially now that the 33rd Street extension is a reality.
Member Wilson asked they could do a joint driveway if the other
property owner agreed? Is that really an option? Planning Director
Peterson responded the property owner to the north has said no to a
joint driveway.
Member Wilson asked the reason for this alternative access was for
trucks? Planning Director Peterson responded this is their only
access. The people to the west have their main drive further down to
the west. This is a truck access for them with a smaller parking lot.
Member Wilson related if they are going to be using it for trucks
would a Kraft Avenue access be better for that? Planning Director
Peterson related 33rd Street is a four lane road in the
middle of the industrial district. It is sufficient for truck traffic.
The applicant, Karlis Mateus, of 6060 Sagebrook Drive in Ada,
related a lot of those issues we talked about with the property owner
to the north. A couple of options were discussed. We desired something
off Kraft Avenue. The County very adamantly said no driveway at that
location on Kraft. Thirty-third Street was really our only option. The
reason is for trucks. If we put a driveway out to Kraft with the
position of the building and the setbacks we would lose a lot of land
and that would prevent expansion later on. The Kraft driveway will not
happen anyway. This is to separate the employee traffic from truck
traffic.
Member Beahan asked how much truck traffic is there. Mr. Mateus
responded two to four trucks per day with a UPS truck twice a day.
Member Lewis supported by Member Robinson moved to open the public
hearing. The motion carried and the public hearing was opened.
Planning Director Peterson related he received no comments
regarding the request.
There being no one else to speak on the matter, Member Lewis
supported by Member Wilson moved to close the public hearing. The
motion carried and the public hearing was closed.
Member Lewis related part of our job as Zoning Board members is to
explore alternatives and the applicant has done that. At a different
location those alternatives could be pursued. This site is on a road
with a low speed limit. The driveway spacing requirement is made to
limit the number of driveways for safety purposes. I don’t see where
granting a variance on a road with limited access and a limited speed
limit would be a safety factor in granting the variance.
Member Lewis supported by Member Wilson moved to grant the variance.
Member Wilson related it is important to bring up the issue of
safety for employees and that has to be taken into consideration.
Having employees come in the east drive with trucks would create
safety issues. We have the option to make things a little easier and
safer with granting the variance.
The motion carried.
Member Lewis related he would like clarification on the request to
the Planning Commission to look into updating the ordinance. Planning
Director Peterson related now may be a good time to update the
ordinance. Chapter 19 addresses driveway spacing. Appendix B shows the
road with a 30 mph speed limit. It is actually posted at 35. If
Appendix B showed the road at 35 mph there would be a required spacing
of 160 feet between driveways. Planning Director Peterson related he
will place that on the Planning Commission Work Plan for 2003.
ARTICLE 6. Any Other Business
None presented.
ARTICLE 7. Adjournment
Member Robinson supported by Member Wilson moved to adjourn. The
motion carried and the meeting was adjourned at 7:29 pm.
Respectfully submitted.
Claude Robinson, Secretary
CR:MJT

Government
~ Departments ~
Community
Business ~
Reference Desk ~
What's Happening
Help ~
Home ~ Search ~ Site Map
Comments? Feedback? Questions? Click here to send an email.
Site Use Policy
This page last modified
06/08/04.
All information © 2003-2004Cascade Township, Michigan
|
Site
Design/Development by
 |
|